Eric Jang: My Criteria for Reviewing Papers
blog.evjang.com · 1,581 words · saved by 2 readers
Xiaoyi Yin (尹肖贻) has kindly translated this post into Chinese ( 中文 ) Accept-or-reject decisions for the NeurIPS 2020 conference are out, wi...
Xiaoyi Yin (尹肖贻) has kindly translated this post into Chinese (中文) Accept-or-reject decisions for the NeurIPS 2020 conference are out, with 9454 submissions and 1900 accepted papers (20% acceptance rate). Congratulations to everyone (regardless of acceptance decision) for their hard work in doing good research! It's common knowledge among machine learning (ML) researchers that acceptance decisions at NeurIPS and other conferences are something of a weighted dice roll. In this silly theatre we call "Academic Publishing" -- a mostly disjoint concept from research by the way --, reviews are…
saved by
related reading
- Free Office Hours for Non-Traditional ML Researchersblog.evjang.com
- An Opinionated Guide to ML Researchjoschu.net
- Finally, an ML conference review guide! – Austin Tripp’s websiteaustintripp.ca
- How to win a best paper award (or, an opinionated take on how to do important research)nicholas.carlini.com
- Highly Opinionated Advice on How to Write ML Papers — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Tips for Empirical Alignment Research — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Paper reviewsstanford-cs324.github.io
- Paper Quality Assessment based on Individual Wisdom Metrics from Open Peer Reviewarxiv.org
- PowerPoint Presentationcs.ryerson.ca
- Heuristics for Scientific Writing (a Machine Learning Perspective) – Approximately Correctapproximatelycorrect.com
- Templates for machine learning research papers | Neel Guhaneelguha.github.io
- De-mystifying Good Research and Good Papers · Technology & Research Blogbigaidream.gitbooks.io