I declined all my HCI PC invites. Here's why.
I recently received, and politely declined, invitations to serve on the Program Committees (that I had been servicing for years) for several Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) conferences. This isn't a rejection of the field (I have been declining such requests from AI/ML conferences too), but a reflection on where I believe my limited time and expertise can be most impactful, particularly in the context of rapid AI advancement. But in thinking about my priorities and existing commitments, I’ve come to a difficult conclusion: HCI, in its current form, is increasingly irrelevant to the cutting edge of AI. (and the existing peer-review system is not worth the personal investment regardless of the field - and that's old news)
**I declined all my HCI PC invites. Here's why.** I recently received, and politely declined, invitations to serve on the Program Committees (that I had been servicing for years) for several Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) conferences. This isn't a rejection of the field (I have been declining such requests from AI/ML conferences too), but a reflection on where I believe my limited time and expertise can be most impactful, particularly in the context of rapid AI advancement. But in thinking about my priorities and existing commitments, I’ve come to a difficult conclusion: HCI, in its current
saved by
related reading
- The machines are fine. I'm worried about us.ergosphere.blog
- What will be left for us to work on?normaltech.ai
- Is AI Breaking HCI?humanityworking.net
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- 2023 letter | Zhengdongzhengdongwang.com
- Assessing skeptical views of interpretability research | Christopher Pottsweb.stanford.edu
- Reflections on 2025samuelalbanie.substack.com
- machine learning imindslice.substack.com
- [2603.26524] Mathematical methods and human thought in the age of AIarxiv.org
- Human–computer interaction - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Thoughts — Jason Weijasonwei.net
- Sporadicamichaelnotebook.com