Good QC for RL Data
seancai.com · 2,670 words · saved by 4 readers
Read my thoughts on Good QC for RL Data
This is a preview piece - for more writing and a state of data report, visit my substack . In January, I proposed a new definition for Type 1, Type 2 data, pending drastic need from the data industry on how to evaluate data quality. A conscious side-effect of the shift to longer horizon regiments is increased need for model-based QA, far beyond the body-shop capabilities of current day data companies. The progression of what data markets we entered first directly corresponded to how verifiable we could make each one. We filtered the hard domains out of the field at the infrastructure layer, fi
saved by
related reading
- The Bitter Lesson - RL Environments Versionseancai.com
- State of Data (Jan 2026)seancai.com
- Vikram Aditya (@viks_rum) on Xx.com
- Rethinking RL Infra for Agents | B'Logbillxbf.github.io
- What the hell happened with AGI timelines in 2026?80000hours.substack.com
- Sweatshop data is overmechanize.work
- Q-learning is not yet scalableseohong.me
- What We’ve Learned From A Year of Building with LLMs – Applied LLMsapplied-llms.org
- Oversight Assistants: Turning Compute into Understandingbounded-regret.ghost.io
- A World of Verifiable Domainsseancai.com
- The Compute Verification Postfirstscattering.com
- Cheap RL tasks will waste compute | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work