Cheap RL tasks will waste compute | Mechanize Inc.
mechanize.work · 896 words · saved by 4 readers
As RL training compute gets more expensive, AI labs will spend thousands of dollars per task on environment quality.
Cheap RL tasks will waste compute | Mechanize, Inc. Cheap RL tasks will waste compute Ege Erdil, Matthew Barnett, Tamay Besiroglu August 18, 2025 When creating RL tasks, one faces a choice between two different approaches. One can either spend a lot of engineering effort per task to make a small number of hand-crafted tasks that provide highly informative reward signals. Or one can employ various methods of procedural generation to create a much larger number of tasks, with less engineering effort per task, at the cost of reduced task diversity and weaker reward signals. This is essentially a
saved by
related reading
- The upcoming GPT-3 moment for RL | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Sweatshop data is overmechanize.work
- What if RL Environments Aren't Mispriced?benanderson.work
- [2510.13786] The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMsarxiv.org
- Why compute might get 10x more expensive in coming yearsdwarkesh.com
- Trust me bro, just one more RL scale up, this one will be the real scale up with the good environments, the actually legit one, trust me bro — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- will depue on X: "A Stargate for Data Labs are on a trajectory towards >$100B/year of data spend by 2030. As we begin the trillion-dollar compute project, we need to think about the equivalent civilizational-scale effort for the other core x.com
- Keep the Tokens Flowing: Lessons from 16 Open-Source RL Librarieshuggingface.co
- Training Imperativesdan.io
- RL Environments and RL for Science: Data Foundries and Multi-Agent Architecturesnewsletter.semianalysis.com
- The Extreme Inefficiency of RL for Frontier Models - Toby Ordtobyord.com
- Sporks of AGIsergeylevine.substack.com