Can we quantify Foul-Baiting? The SGA analytics Saga PT. 2
dh2chen.substack.com · 1,873 words · saved by 1 readers
Will aura be enough defense @ the trial of SGA?
So as promised I am back with part 2 of our mathematical exploration into whether Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is truly foul-baiting at an unprecedented rate, or if this is an overblown social media narrative. Last time, we were left with a somewhat unsatisfying conclusion. After spending some more time with the problem, and employing some more sophisticated statistical techniques, I am pleased to announce that I now have some very juicy findings to report… so stay tuned! If you recall, our idea now is to build a multiple regression model for expected Free Throw Attempts (xFTAs) as follows:…
saved by
related reading
- How much do you believe your results? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Anonymous NBA player poll 2025: SGA or Jokić for MVP? Most overrated? Too many 3-pointers? - The Athleticnytimes.com
- Stop aggregating away the signal in your data - Stack Overflowstackoverflow.blog
- A statistical approach to model evaluations \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Good QC for RL Dataseancai.com
- Uncertainty in xG. Part 2: Partial Pooling – All Your Bayesallyourbayes.com
- a bunch of other more stufftenenbaum2001.substack.com
- A simple article templatearxiv.org
- [2411.00640] Adding Error Bars to Evals: A Statistical Approach to Language Model Evaluationsarxiv.org
- About Box Plus/Minus (BPM) | Basketball-Reference.combasketball-reference.com
- Uncertainty in xG. Part 1: Overview – All Your Bayesallyourbayes.com
- Getting In To A Causal Flow - by Ken Acquah - Causal Flowscausalflows.substack.com