Surya Dantuluri (@sdan): "It has never been easier to be in the top 1% of a field because the baseline competence has been raised to GPT-5. But conversely, it has never been harder to matter because there are exponentially more players standing on that same baseline. A 10x outcome on a billion dollars is…"
It has never been easier to be in the top 1% of a field because the baseline competence has been raised to GPT-5. But conversely, it has never been harder to matter because there are exponentially more players standing on that same baseline. A 10x outcome on a billion dollars is fundamentally different from a 10x outcome on a million, yet the attention economy treats them as equal. The "founders" chasing ngmi passion projects are doing so because the algorithms have conditioned them to optimize for the wrong metric: social consensus rather than information asymmetry. Everyone in every demographic is online in 2025. The algorithms ruthlessly synchronize consensus, so the "in-crowd" has never been larger or more coordinated. Talent is now in-fighting over publicly available information; when competence is commoditized, differentiation collapses into politics and king-making. In this noise, net-new dollars from industries and consumers outside the circle increasingly become the higher-fidelity signal. The frontier of what’s possible now lies in mining the work of people solving problems that aren't on the internet yet; extracting sequences of action across hours, days, weeks of labor to capture the tacit and hidden. We haven’t even mapped our own ocean. We're exiting the era where execution and capital were as influential as ideas and socioeconomic capital. Now ideas dominate, only if you have the compute to execute them and produce net new information. The winners now won't be using AGI to do the same things faster or cheaper. This has always existed, yet a new capitalism is emerging; unprecedented in its ability to hyper-concentrate power, bottlenecked today only by politics. These winners will produce exponentially more net new information. When is the last time you tasted something you've never tasted before? There's infinite competition in starting a restaurant; effectively competing on service rather than food. Winning in some sense has never been
It has never been easier to be in the top 1% of a field because the baseline competence has been raised to GPT-5. But conversely, it has never been harder to matter because there are exponentially more players standing on that same baseline. A 10x outcome on a billion dollars is fundamentally different from a 10x outcome on a million, yet the attention economy treats them as equal. The "founders" chasing ngmi passion projects are doing so because the algorithms have conditioned them to optimize for the wrong metric: social consensus rather than information asymmetry. Everyone in every…
saved by
related reading
- By default, capital will matter more than ever after AGI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Stratechery by Ben Thompson – On the business, strategy, and impact of technology.stratechery.com
- Being the (Pareto) Best in the World — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Capital, AGI, and Human Ambition - The Intelligence Curseintelligence-curse.ai
- At least you’re likable - Julia Willemynsjuliawillemyns.substack.com
- Power in the Age of Intelligencenotboring.co
- The AI Unbundling – Stratechery by Ben Thompsonstratechery.com
- From Winner Take All to Win and Help Win: the Original Vision of… — Sari Azoutsariazout.mirror.xyz
- Sam Altman on Loving Community, Hating Coworking, and the Hunt for Talent (Ep. 61 - Live in SF) | Conversations with Tylerconversationswithtyler.com
- Capital, AGI, and human ambitionrudolf.website
- Solve Everythingsolveeverything.org
- The Only Moat Left Is Moneyelliotbonneville.com