Maximizing the Scientific ROI from International PhDs | Institute for Progress
ifp.org · 2,327 words · saved by 2 readers
Scientific grants should be awarded on the basis of merit, not nationality.
Content Executive summary Introduction Overview of funding programs and expanding international eligibility Funding opportunities are limited to US citizens and LPRs Recommendations Recommendation 1: Expand postdoc and fellowship eligibility to include temporary visa holders. Recommendation 2: Waive the home residency requirement for J-1 holders with research funded by a federal agency. Executive summary The NIH and NSF invest billions each year to train scientists — graduate students and postdocs — through fellowships and grants. However, the effectiveness of these funds is not fully realized
saved by
related reading
- The Talent Scout State | IFPifp.org
- A Survival Guide to a PhDkarpathy.github.io
- How research grant applications are slowing scientific progress | Voxvox.com
- Funding R&D in Developing Countriesmattsclancy.substack.com
- JEFworks Lab - Nih F Series Grant Tips And Examplejef.works
- Funding is All You Need: Getting into Grad School by Hacking the NSF GRFP Fellowship — LessWronglesswrong.com
- America’s immigration policy is driving away future AI leadersrestofworld.org
- Developing the science of science - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- National Fellowships - National and International Fellowships and Scholarships - Office of Undergraduate Research and Scholar Development - Carnegie Mellon Universitycmu.edu
- What’s Wrong with NIH Grants?substack.com
- The trouble in comparing different approaches to science fundingscienceplusplus.org
- Niven T. Achenjang | postdoc application advicepeople.math.harvard.edu