Comments on “How To Think Real Good” | Meta-rationality

So my problem with the substantial advice on thinking that you give in this post is that… I don’t disagree with it. Nor do I really think that it contradicts anything that has been said on LW. In fact, if it was somewhat polished, cut into a set of smaller posts and posted on LW, I expect that it might get quite upvoted.

Comments on “How To Think Real Good” | Meta-rationality Comments on “How To Think Real Good” Adding new comments is disabled for now. Comments are for the page: How To Think Real Good So my problem with the substantial advice on thinking that you give in this post is that… I don't disagree with it. Nor do I really think that it contradicts anything that has been said on LW. In fact, if it was somewhat polished, cut into a set of smaller posts and posted on LW, I expect that it might get quite upvoted. One thing that has started to increasingly bother me in this debate is that you seem t

related reading

• How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
• Why I'm not a Bayesianmindthefuture.info
• Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Bayesian Mindsetcold-takes.com
• Probability theory, understood meta-rationallymeaningness.substack.com
• What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Probabilities Without Measurements | Vaden Masranivmasrani.github.io
• Your Strength as a Rationalist — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
• Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com
• A Technical Explanation of Technical Explanation – Eliezer S. Yudkowskyyudkowsky.net