Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? | Science | The Guardian

The long read: It is an industry like no other, with profit margins to rival Google – and it was created by one of Britain’s most notorious tycoons: Robert Maxwell

illustration for science publishing long read Illustration: Dom McKenzie It is an industry like no other, with profit margins to rival Google – and it was created by one of Britain’s most notorious tycoons: Robert Maxwell By Stephen Buranyi Tue 27 Jun 2017 01.00 EDT Last modified on Mon 25 Aug 2025 09.55 EDT Share Prefer the Guardian on Google I n 2011, Claudio Aspesi, a senior investment analyst at Bernstein Research in London, made a bet that the dominant firm in one of the most lucrative industries in the world was headed for a crash. Reed-Elsevier , a multinational publishing giant with an

related reading

• The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to doexperimental-history.com
• The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era | PLOS Onejournals.plos.org
• Elsevier — my part in its downfall | Gowers's Webloggowers.wordpress.com
• Market Failures in Sciencemilan.cvitkovic.net
• In Solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-hubcustodians.online
• The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianniexperimentalhistory.substack.com
• Elsevier - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• An invitation to a secret society - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
• No, it’s not The Incentives—it’s you – [citation needed]talyarkoni.org
• A History of Scientific Journals | UCL Pressuclpress.co.uk
• Real peer review has never been tried - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
• How Nature Became a 'Prestige' Journal - Asimov Pressasimov.press