More Is Different for AI
Machine learning is touching increasingly many aspects of our society, and its effect will only continue to grow. Given this, I and many others care about risks from future ML systems and how to mitigate them. When thinking about safety risks from ML, there are two common approaches, which I'll
Machine learning is touching increasingly many aspects of our society, and its effect will only continue to grow. Given this, I and many others care about risks from future ML systems and how to mitigate them. When thinking about safety risks from ML, there are two common approaches, which I'll call the Engineering approach and the Philosophy approach: The Engineering approach tends to be empirically-driven, drawing experience from existing or past ML systems and looking at issues that either: (1) are already major problems, or (2) are minor problems, but can be expected to get worse in the fu
saved by
- Winnie Xu
- Enora ʕ ᄋ ᴥ ᄋʔ
- Micah Carroll
- Serena Ge
- Hangyul Lyna Kim
- Lydia Nottingham
- Natalie Ho
- Timothy Kostolansky
- Nibir Sankar
related reading
- Future ML Systems Will Be Qualitatively Differentbounded-regret.ghost.io
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- A Bird's Eye View of the ML Field [Pragmatic AI Safety #2] — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- From Philosophy to Math to Engineering - Machine Intelligence Research Instituteintelligence.org
- AI Safety Seems Hard to Measurecold-takes.com
- Future ML Systems Will Be Qualitatively Different — LessWronglesswrong.com
- My picture of the present in AI - by Ryan Greenblattblog.redwoodresearch.org