✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Sometimes It’s O.K. to Let a Language Die | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 4,189 words · saved by 1 readers
When cultural preservation comes at the expense of speakers’ decisions, sometimes it's O.K. to let a language die.
Save this story Save this story How sad should we be when a language dies? Consider the case—call it callous or simply tough-minded—for saying, “Not at all.” A language, when it comes down to it, is a means of communication. When too few people are using it to communicate, it has stopped doing its principal job, and it may as well be allowed to die. It is, of course, a tragedy when languages are killed , especially when they are killed out of malice or bigotry. But death by natural causes—well, that’s just how things go. Despite its ominous title, Sophia Smith Galer’s “ How to Kill a Language:
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Language Birth—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- Politics and the English Language | The Orwell Foundationorwellfoundation.com
- The Parents Trying to Pass Down a Language They Hardly Speak - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- Should India Speak a Single Language? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- ‘I can still hear their words’: the fight to save the Híɫzaqv language | Canada | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- アイヌ語や宮古語、「消滅危機言語」つなぐ外国人研究者 - 日本経済新聞nikkei.com
- To Speak Is to Blunder | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- To Speak Is to Blunder | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Literary Hub >> Jhumpa Lahiri on Preserving the Multiplicity of Languagelithub.com
- Linguistic relativity - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Language isolate - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Đa ngôn ngữ – Wikipedia tiếng Việtvi.wikipedia.org