How Should We Critique Research? · Gwern.net
Criticizing studies and statistics is hard in part because so many criticisms are possible, rendering them meaningless. What makes a good criticism is the chance of being a ‘difference which makes a difference’ to our ultimate actions.
--- title: How Should We Critique Research? description: Criticizing studies and statistics is hard in part because so many criticisms are possible, rendering them meaningless. What makes a good criticism is the chance of being a 'difference which makes a difference' to our ultimate actions. created: 2019-05-19 modified: 2019-07-07 status: finished confidence: highly likely importance: 8 css-extension: dropcaps-kanzlei ... > Scientific and statistical research must be read with a critical eye to understand how credible the claims are. The Reproducibility Crisis and the growth of meta-science h
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- How Should We Critique Research? · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Against NHST — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Research Taste Exercises [rough note] -- colah's blogcolah.github.io
- A statistical approach to model evaluations \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Getting Eulered | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Statistical Significance vs. Practical Significance of Research Resultspages.uoregon.edu
- There are no statistics in the Kingdom of Godexperimental-history.com
- Fake Journal Club: Teaching Critical Reading · Gwern.netgwern.net
- You Are Not Measuring What You Think You Are Measuring — LessWronglesswrong.com
- CAUSE, EFFECT, AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE SOCIAL WORLD. MEGAN T. STEVENSONbu.edu
- Gwern's Most Important Writing (in essays, tweets, book reviews, and other forms) - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Statisticism: How Cluster-Thinking About Data Creates Blind Spotsbenjaminrosshoffman.com