✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
A statistical approach to model evaluations \ Anthropic
anthropic.com · 1,702 words · saved by 4 readers
Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.
Evaluations A statistical approach to model evaluations Nov 19, 2024 Read the paper Suppose an AI model outperforms another model on a benchmark of interest—testing its general knowledge, for example, or its ability to solve computer-coding questions. Is the difference in capabilities real, or could one model simply have gotten lucky in the choice of questions on the benchmark? With the amount of public interest in AI model evaluations—informally called “evals”—this question remains surprisingly understudied among the AI research community. This month, we published a new research paper that at
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- Applying Statistics to LLM Evaluationscameronrwolfe.substack.com
- The bitter lesson of LLM evalsparsed.com
- Demystifying evals for AI agents \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI Benchmark Leaderboards & Model Evals | BenchmarkListbenchmarklist.com
- Your Evals Will Break and You Won't See It Coming - Lun Wangwanglun1996.github.io
- [2412.00543] Evaluating the Consistency of LLM Evaluatorsarxiv.org
- Quantifying infrastructure noise in agentic coding evals \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- A starter guide for evals — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Challenges in evaluating AI systems \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- We Need A ‘Science of Evals’ – Apollo Researchapolloresearch.ai
- We need a Science of Evals — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- AI Model & API Providers Analysis | Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai