Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review | SpringerLink
Despite the increasing utility of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for management of anterior skull base (ASB) pathologies, the optimal treatment strategy for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM) remains unclear. This project sought to systematically compare outcomes of EEA management with conventional transcranial approach (TCA) for the treatment of OGMs. A systematic review was performed to identify studies that compared outcomes following EEA and TCA for OGMs. Data extracted from each study included gross total resection (GTR), incidence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, and post-operative complications including anosmia. The results of the search yielded 5 studies which met the criteria for inclusion and analysis. All studies compared TCA (n = 922) with EEA (n = 141) outcomes for OGMs. Overall, the rate of gross total resection (GTR) was lower among the endoscopic group (70.9%) relative to the transcranial group (91.5%). The rate of post-operative CSF leak was 6.3% vs. 25.5% for the transcranial and endoscopic groups, respectively. Post-operative anosmia was higher for patients undergoing EEA (95.9%) compared with patients in the transcranial group (37.4%). In this analysis, EEA was associated with a lower rate of GTR and higher incidences of CSF leaks and post-operative anosmia. However, with increasing surgeon familiarity of the endoscopic anatomy and technique for managing ASB pathologies, a nuanced approach may be used to minimize patient morbidity and widen the spectrum of skull base surgery.
Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review Review Published: 10 November 2019 Volume 43 , pages 1465–1471 ( 2020 ) Cite this article Save article View saved research Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript Abstract Despite the increasing utility of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for management of anterior skull base (ASB) pathologies, the optimal treatment strategy for olfactory groove meningiomas (OGM) remains unclear. This project sought to systematically compare outcomes of EEA management with co
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review | Acta Neurochirurgica | Springer Nature Linklink.springer.com
- Frontiers | Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas Through Unilateral vs. Bilateral Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisfrontiersin.org
- Brasil - Olfactory groove meningiomas: surgical technique and follow-up review Olfactory groove meningiomas: surgical technique and follow-up reviewscielo.br
- Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy for Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review with pooled analysis - PMCncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- We Induced Artificial Smells With Ultrasound Brain Stimulation | Write to Brainwritetobrain.com
- Parra lab at City University of New Yorkparralab.org
- Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma in: Journal of Neurosurgery Volume 126 Issue 1 (2017) Journalsthejns.org
- Checking your browser - reCAPTCHAncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- ClinicalKeyclinicalkey.com
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma(Archived) - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelfncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Notionnotion.so
- Dysphagia in a Patient with Esophageal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers After Esophageal Reconstruction: A Pharyngeal Clearance Facilitating Maneuver | Dysphagia | Springer Nature Linklink.springer.com