Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review | SpringerLink
Objective To review current management strategies for olfactory groove meningioma (OGM)s and the recent literature comparing endoscopic endonasal (EEA) with traditional transcranial (TCA) approaches. Methods A PubMed search of the recent literature (2011–2016) was performed to examine outcomes following EEA and TCA for OGM. The extent of resection, visual outcome, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were analyzed using percentages and proportions, the Fischer exact test and the Student’s t-test using Graphpad PRISM 7.0Aa (San Diego, CA) software. Results There were 444 patients in the TCA group with a mean diameter of 4.61 (±1.17) cm and 101 patients in the EEA group with a mean diameter of 3.55 (± 0.58) cm (p = 0.0589). GTR was achieved in 90.9% (404/444) in the TCA group and 70.2% (71/101) in the EEA group (p < 0.0001). Of the patients with preoperative visual disturbances, 80.7% (21/26) of patients in the EEA cohort had an improvement in vision compared to 12.83%(29/226) in the TCA group (p < 0.0001). Olfaction was lost in 61% of TCA and in 100% of EEA patients. CSF leaks and meningitis occurred in 25.7% and 4.95% of EEA patients and 6.3% and 1.12% of TCA patients, respectively (p < 0.0001; p = 0.023). Conclusions Our updated literature review demonstrates that despite more experience with endoscopic resection and skull base reconstruction, the literature still supports TCA over EEA with respect to the extent of resection and complications. EEA may be an option in selected cases where visual improvement is the main goal of surgery and postoperative anosmia is acceptable to the patient or in medium-sized tumors with existing preoperative anosmia. Nevertheless, based on our results, it seems more prudent at this time to use TCA for the majority of OGMs.
Limitations of the endonasal endoscopic approach in treating olfactory groove meningiomas. A systematic review Review Article - Brain Tumors Published: 22 August 2017 Volume 159 , pages 1875–1885 ( 2017 ) Cite this article Save article View saved research Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript Abstract Objective To review current management strategies for olfactory groove meningioma (OGM)s and the recent literature comparing endoscopic endonasal (EEA) with traditional transcranial (TCA) approaches. Methods A PubMed search of the recent literature (2011–2016) was performed to exa
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Endoscopic endonasal versus transcranial approach to resection of olfactory groove meningiomas: a systematic review | Neurosurgical Review | Springer Nature Linklink.springer.com
- Frontiers | Resection of Olfactory Groove Meningiomas Through Unilateral vs. Bilateral Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysisfrontiersin.org
- Brasil - Olfactory groove meningiomas: surgical technique and follow-up review Olfactory groove meningiomas: surgical technique and follow-up reviewscielo.br
- We Induced Artificial Smells With Ultrasound Brain Stimulation | Write to Brainwritetobrain.com
- Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy for Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review with pooled analysis - PMCncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Notionnotion.so
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma(Archived) - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelfncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Parra lab at City University of New Yorkparralab.org
- Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma in: Journal of Neurosurgery Volume 126 Issue 1 (2017) Journalsthejns.org
- Dysphagia in a Patient with Esophageal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers After Esophageal Reconstruction: A Pharyngeal Clearance Facilitating Maneuver | Dysphagia | Springer Nature Linklink.springer.com
- Checking your browser - reCAPTCHAncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Case Study: The Clinical Translation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulationmilan.cvitkovic.net