flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model Forecasters

arxiv.org · 12,786 words · saved by 1 readers

This is experimental HTML to improve accessibility. We invite you to report rendering errors. Use Alt+Y to toggle on accessible reporting links and Alt+Shift+Y to toggle off. Learn more about this project and help improve conversions. Large language models (LLMs) have recently been applied to forecasting tasks, with some works claiming these systems match or exceed human performance. In this paper, we argue that, as a community, we should be careful about such conclusions as evaluating LLM forecasters presents unique challenges. We identify two broad categories of issues: (1) difficulty in trusting evaluation results due to many forms of temporal leakage, and (2) difficulty in extrapolating from evaluation performance to real-world forecasting. Through systematic analysis and concrete examples from prior work, we demonstrate how evaluation flaws can raise concerns about current and future performance claims. We argue that more rigorous evaluation methodologies are needed to confidentl

Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model Forecasters Daniel Paleka 1,∗ Shashwat Goel 2,3,∗ Jonas Geiping 2,3 Florian Tramèr 1 1 ETH Zurich 2 ELLIS Institute Tübingen 3 MPI Tübingen Abstract Large language models (LLMs) have recently been applied to forecasting tasks, with some works claiming these systems match or exceed human performance. In this paper, we argue that, as a community, we should be careful about such conclusions as evaluating LLM forecasters presents unique challenges. We identify two broad categories of issues: (1) difficulty in trusting evaluation results due to many forms of te

Explore this link on the map →

saved by

related reading