flâneur — a map of the web's best reading

Allais paradox - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org · 3,803 words · saved by 1 readers

The Allais paradox is a choice problem designed by Maurice Allais (1953) to show an inconsistency of actual observed choices with the predictions of expected utility theory. Rather than adhering to rationality, the Allais paradox proves that individuals rarely make rational decisions consistently when required to do so immediately. The independence axiom of expected utility theory, which requires that the preferences of an individual should not change when altering two lotteries by equal proportions, was proven to be violated by the paradox.[1] The Allais paradox arises when comparing participants' choices in two different experiments, each of which consists of a choice between two gambles, A and B. The payoffs for each gamble in each experiment are as follows: Several studies[2] involving hypothetical and small monetary payoffs, and recently involving health outcomes,[3] have supported the assertion that when presented with a choice between 1A and 1B, most people would choose 1A. Like

Allais paradox - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Example of irrational preferences over lotteries The Allais paradox is about a hypothetical gambling scenario. The paradox arises when comparing participants' choices in two different experiments, each of which consists of a choice between two gambles. The Allais paradox is a choice problem designed by Maurice Allais in 1953 to show an inconsistency of actual observed choices with the predictions of expected utility theory. The Allais paradox demonstrates that individuals rarely make rational decisions consistentl

Explore this link on the map →

related reading