✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Principles for Meta-Science and AI Safety Replications — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 2,368 words · saved by 1 readers
If we get AI safety research wrong, we may not get a second chance. But despite the stakes being so high, there has been no effort to systematically…
x Principles for Meta-Science and AI Safety Replications — LessWrong Replication Crisis AI Frontpage 48 Principles for Meta-Science and AI Safety Replications by Zephaniah Roe 23rd Jan 2026 4 min read 7 48 If we get AI safety research wrong, we may not get a second chance. But despite the stakes being so high, there has been no effort to systematically review and verify empirical AI safety papers. I would like to change that. Today I sent in funding applications to found a team of researchers dedicated to replicating AI safety work. But what exactly should we aim to accomplish? What should AI
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI safety undervalues founders — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Quality Matters Most When Stakes are Highest — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Safety as a Scientific Pursuit - by Tom McGrathbanburismus.substack.com
- Researchgleech.org
- Automated Alignment is Harder Than You Think — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to meblog.redwoodresearch.org
- Half of social-science studies fail replication test in years-long projectnature.com
- Complex Systems for AI Safety [Pragmatic AI Safety #3] — LessWronglesswrong.com