✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Half of social-science studies fail replication test in years-long project
nature.com · 582 words · saved by 1 readers
Results from massive, ‘eagerly awaited’ initiative reinforce concerns about the credibility of science — but raise hope for solutions.
Email Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Whatsapp X Access through your institution Buy or subscribe A massive seven-year project exploring 3,900 social-science papers has ended with a disturbing finding: researchers could replicate the results of only half of the studies that they tested 1 . Access options Access through your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription $32.99 / 30 days cancel any time Learn more Subscribe to this journal Receive 52 print issues and online access $199.00 per year only $3.83 per issue Lea
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- How to Improve Both Scientific Innovation and Reproducibility at Once – Good Science Projectgoodscienceproject.org
- Cargo Cult Sciencecalteches.library.caltech.edu
- An invitation to a secret society - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Age of Invention: Does History have a Replication Crisis?ageofinvention.xyz
- Scientific Fraud Is Slippery to Catch—but Easier to Combat | WIREDwired.com
- The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianniexperimentalhistory.substack.com
- Market Failures in Sciencemilan.cvitkovic.net
- Is Science Stagnant? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- Reversals in psychologygleech.org