✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
AI safety undervalues founders — LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 9,737 words · saved by 6 readers
TL;DR: In AI safety, we systematically undervalue founders and field‑builders relative to researchers and prolific writers. This status gradient push…
x AI safety undervalues founders — LessWrong AI Alignment Fieldbuilding AI Frontpage 2025 Top Fifty: 11 % 119 AI safety undervalues founders by Ryan Kidd 16th Nov 2025 6 min read 73 119 TL;DR: In AI safety, we systematically undervalue founders and field‑builders relative to researchers and prolific writers. This status gradient pushes talented would‑be founders and amplifiers out of the ecosystem, slows the growth of research orgs and talent funnels, and bottlenecks our capacity to scale the AI safety field. We should deliberately raise the status of founders and field-builders and lower the
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- The case for AI safety capacity-building workmultipliercg.substack.com
- Which side of the AI safety community are you in? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Anthropic's leading researchers acted as moderate accelerationists — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How do we close the Junior <> Senior talent gap™? · Ady Mehtaadymehta.xyz
- Talent Needs of Technical AI Safety Teams — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Anthropic IPO Is Coming. We Aren't Ready for It. — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI safety technical research | Career review | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- Field map – AISafety.comaisafety.com
- AI Safety Talent Needs in 2026: Insights for Field-Building Organizationsmatsresearch.substack.com
- There should be more AI safety orgs — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- Core views on AI safety: When, why, what, and how \ Anthropicanthropic.com