Learning to learn from inventions: electrophoresis, PCR, Sanger sequencing — lada nuzhna
Warning: The aim of this post is to understand the process and style of thinking that led scientists to discover electrophoresis, PCR, and Sanger sequencing. I decided not to explain these techniques, so this post might get confusing at times if you are unfamiliar with them. What is the pattern of
Learning to learn from inventions: electrophoresis, PCR, Sanger sequencing The aim of this post is to understand the process and style of thinking that led scientists to discover electrophoresis, PCR, and Sanger sequencing. I decided not to explain these techniques, so this post might get confusing at times if you are unfamiliar with them. What is the pattern of thinking that leads people to great discoveries? For instance, were the critical tools we use today in biology-such as sequencing or mass spectrometry-simply like an apple falling on Newton's head? Could you have developed these tools
related reading
- Kary B. Mullis – Nobel Lecture - NobelPrize.orgnobelprize.org
- Even “Boring” Ideas are Surprisingly Deep - Niko McCartynikomc.com
- A Visual Guide to DNA Sequencingasimov.press
- What's different? Part one: Sequencingcenturyofbio.com
- What's different? Part three: Scalecenturyofbio.com
- Research as Understanding ∙ Kanjun Qiukanjun.me
- What's Different? Using the modelcenturyofbio.com
- Eureka! On the clustering of geniuses - by Rohit Krishnanstrangeloopcanon.com
- What's different? Part one: Sequencingcenturyofbio.substack.com
- What's different? Part three: Scalecenturyofbio.substack.com
- The River Divides into Thousands of Branches: Preface and Acknowledgmentsscalar.fas.harvard.edu
- jsomers.net | I should have loved biologyjsomers.net