Frame pointers vs DWARF – my verdict | Richard WM Jones
A couple of weeks ago I wrote a blog posting here about Fedora having frame pointers (LWN backgrounder, HN thread). I made some mistakes in that blog posting and retracted it, but I wasn’t wr…
Frame pointers vs DWARF – my verdict | Richard WM Jones Richard WM Jones Skip to content Home About ← SmithForth nbdkit’s evil filter → February 14, 2023 · 10:52 am ↓ Jump to Comments Frame pointers vs DWARF – my verdict A couple of weeks ago I wrote a blog posting here about Fedora having frame pointers ( LWN backgrounder , HN thread ). I made some mistakes in that blog posting and retracted it , but I wasn’t wrong about the conclusions, just wrong about how I reached them. Frame pointers are much better than DWARF. DWARF unwinding might have some
saved by
related reading
- All my favorite tracing tools: eBPF, QEMU, Perfetto, new ones I built and more - Tristan Humethume.ca
- abseil / Performance Hintsabseil.io
- Tristan's Site - Tristan Humethume.ca
- GitHub - flamegraph-rs/flamegraph: Easy flamegraphs for Rust projects and everything else, without Perl or pipes <3 · GitHubgithub.com
- perf-config(1) - Linux manual pageman7.org
- NYSRGnotes.ekzhang.com
- Speeding Up the Webcola Graph Viz Library with Rust + WebAssembly - Casey Primozic's Homepagecprimozic.net
- Announcing Grafana Phlare, the open source database for continuous profiling at massive scalegrafana.com
- PERF tutorial: Finding execution hot spots - Sand, software and soundsandsoftwaresound.net
- Configuring Blackfire Continuous Profiler for Rustdocs.blackfire.io
- Watch: How to get started with Grafana Phlare for continuous profilinggrafana.com
- What is continuous profiling? | CNCFcncf.io