Who ordered memory fences on an x86? | Bartosz Milewski's Programming Cafe
Multiprocessors with relaxed memory models can be very confusing. Writes can be seen out of order, reads can be speculative and return values from the future–what a mess! In order to impose s…
Who ordered memory fences on an x86? | Bartosz Milewski's Programming Cafe Home About Bartosz Milewski's Programming Cafe Category Theory, Haskell, Concurrency, C++ November 5, 2008 Who ordered memory fences on an x86? Posted by Bartosz Milewski under C++ , Concurrency , Multicore , Multithreading , Programming [54] Comments Multiprocessors with relaxed memory models can be very confusing. Writes can be seen out of order, reads can be speculative and return values from the future–what a mess! In order to impose some kind of consistency you have to use memory fences, and there a
saved by
related reading
- Memory Barriers Are Like Source Control Operationspreshing.com
- Reading privileged memory with a side-channel - Project Zerogoogleprojectzero.blogspot.com
- research!rsc: Hardware Memory Models (Memory Models, Part 1)research.swtch.com
- The Go Memory Model - The Go Programming Languagego.dev
- Zenbleedlock.cmpxchg8b.com
- Linux kernel memory barriers — The Linux Kernel documentationdocs.kernel.org
- C++11 Memory Modelpeople.cs.pitt.edu
- LittleBookOfSemaphores.pdfgreenteapress.com
- Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed Systemlamport.azurewebsites.net
- Inter-process communication in Linux: Shared storage | Opensource.comopensource.com
- GitHub - xoreaxeaxeax/asm-hall-of-shame: Racing to the bottom of CPU performancegithub.com
- Optimization barriers | Pintos Documentationcs162.org