The logic of Buddhist philosophy goes beyond simple truth | Aeon Essays
aeon.co · 3,749 words · saved by 1 readers
Buddhist philosophy is full of contradictions. Now modern logic is learning why that might be a good thing
Western philosophers have not, on the whole, regarded Buddhist thought with much enthusiasm. As a colleague once said to me: ‘It’s all just mysticism.’ This attitude is due, in part, to ignorance. But it is also due to incomprehension. When Western philosophers look East, they find things they do not understand – not least the fact that the Asian traditions seem to accept, and even endorse, contradictions. Thus we find the great second-century Buddhist philosopher Nagarjuna saying: The nature of things is to have no nature; it is their non-nature that is their nature. For they have only one…
saved by
related reading
- Neurotic Gradient Descent: (mis)Translating the Buddhaneuroticgradientdescent.blogspot.com
- Why I'm not a philosophergleech.org
- Ludwig.Wittgenstein.-.Philosophical.Investigations.pdfstatic1.squarespace.com
- Why I wish Buddhists had a good anti-Buddhism litanynothingismere.substack.com
- Neurotic Gradient Descent: (mis)Translating the Buddhaneuroticgradientdescent.blogspot.com
- More than argument, logic is the very structure of realityaeon.co
- Why I'm not a Bayesianmindthefuture.info
- What's the point of words?samkriss.substack.com
- On Some Differences Between Insight Meditation and Zen – The Existential Buddhistexistentialbuddhist.com
- Definability of Truth in Probabilistic Logic - Christiano 2013intelligence.org
- Intuitionistic logic - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Mind in Indian Buddhist Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu