Against Steelmanning | Thing of Things
I hate the word ‘steelmanning.’ Steelmanning refers to arguing with the best possible version of someone’s argument, even if it’s not the one they presented. Put like that, …
Tags ozy blog post , rationality I hate the word ‘steelmanning.’ Steelmanning refers to arguing with the best possible version of someone’s argument, even if it’s not the one they presented . Put like that, it sounds really good! After all, we all think it’s important not to misrepresent people [citation needed]; trying to present the best possible version of someone’s argument is good. The problem is that every time I’ve seen the word ‘steelman’ used, it’s referring to one of two things. In the least obnoxious case, Alice misinterpre
related reading
- The Rationality Community Sucksuli.rocks
- [REPOST] Epistemic Learned Helplessness | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Steelmanning The Case For Consultants, Affirmative Action, and Alcoholhumaninvariant.substack.com
- Galaxy brain resistancevitalik.eth.limo
- Annoyingly Principled People, and what befalls them — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Categories Were Made For Man, Not Man For The Categories | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Matt Yglesias Considered As The Nietzschean Supermanastralcodexten.com
- A Field Guide to Bad Faith Argumentsaaronhuertas.com
- Language Policing: Gaslighting | Thing of Thingsthingofthings.wordpress.com
- Against truthsamkriss.substack.com
- Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com