Attention is all we have - David Bessis
substack.com · 5,583 words · saved by 1 readers
A conjectural theory of cognitive inequality
Some people are smarter than others—and some are fabulously smart. We may disagree on many things, but can we at least agree on that? The origin of cognitive inequality is a hot, divisive topic. The existence of cognitive inequality is hardly controversial. We do struggle to come up with a satisfactory definition of intelligence, especially in its most creative and socially valuable forms, but most agree that people like Leonardo da Vinci, William Shakespeare, Nikola Tesla, or John von Neumann were extraordinarily intelligent. This aligns well with my experience in pure math academia,…
related reading
- Attention is all we havedavidbessis.substack.com
- Childhoods of exceptional people - by Henrik Karlssonhenrikkarlsson.xyz
- Why we stopped making Einsteins - by Erik Hoelerikhoel.substack.com
- How To Understand Thingsnabeelqu.substack.com
- How To Become a Mathematical Geniusbutthistime.com
- Why aren't smart people happier? - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- The Algernon Argument · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Why we stopped making Einsteins - by Erik Hoeltheintrinsicperspective.com
- Childhoods of exceptional people - by Henrik Karlssonescapingflatland.substack.com
- What is intelligence?theoriesofintelligence.substack.com
- Neuroscience is pre-paradigmatic. Consciousness is whytheintrinsicperspective.com
- Childhoods of exceptional people — LessWronglesswrong.com