The Algernon Argument · Gwern.net
gwern.net · 22,380 words · saved by 6 readers
Why most supplements fail: IQ improvement skepticism, Yudkowsky & Bostrom’s heuristics, nootropics
--- title: The Algernon Argument description: "Why most supplements fail: IQ improvement skepticism, Yudkowsky & Bostrom's heuristics, nootropics" created: 2010-03-23 modified: 2018-06-03 status: finished confidence: highly likely importance: 10 css-extension: dropcaps-kanzlei ... That intelligence ([_g_](!W "g factor (psychometrics)")) in healthy people is nearly impossible to improve is clear from the failure of psychology to provide any such method. But *why* intelligence would be so constant is not as clear: many other cognitive abilities are improvable (like working memory), so why not in
saved by
related reading
- Algernon's Law 1.1web.archive.org
- nickbostrom.com/evolutionary-optimality.pdfnickbostrom.com
- [REPOST] Epistemic Learned Helplessness | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Getting Eulered | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Gwern's Most Important Writing (in essays, tweets, book reviews, and other forms) - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Mental Models: The Best Way to Make Intelligent Decisions (~100 Models Explained)fs.blog
- Research Ideas - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Applying IQ to IQrazib.substack.com
- Theses on Sleep - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Hotel Concierge — The Stanford Marshmallow Prison Experimenthotelconcierge.tumblr.com