All Posts - LessWrong
lesswrong.com · 1,258 words · saved by 2 readers
All of LessWrong's posts, filtered and sorted however you want
81meemi2d The Nordic Council[1] recommends that Nordic governments “evaluate the risks of the development of superintelligent artificial intelligence and pursue the development of international regulations that effectively prevent or limit the development of superintelligent artificial intelligence.” This is one non-binding recommendation among many in the new Nordic Council Strategy for Societal Security.[2] (You can DM me for encouragement/advice about informing your reps about AI danger and preventing superintelligence. Be transparent.) 1. ^ A cross-party, inter-parliamentary council…
saved by
related reading
- LessWronglesswrong.com
- My picture of the present in AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- A History of the Future, 2025-2040 — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Consider chilling out in 2028 — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI in 2025: gestalt — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlled — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Case Against AI Control Research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Where I agree and disagree with Eliezer — LessWronglesswrong.com
- I am worried about near-term non-LLM AI developments — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Three Filters: Why Almost Every Plan to Survive ASI Fails Miserably — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI 2040: Plan A — LessWronglesswrong.com
- I Would Have Solved Alignment, But I Was Worried That Would Advance Timelines — LessWronglesswrong.com