If time is the 4th dimension, doesn't it mean we can perceive the 4th dimension since time isn't new to us? : r/AskPhysics
I think usually when people say we can't perceive 4th dimension, they mean spatial. Time is a 4th dimension but its properties are fundamentally different than spatial dimensions. We don’t perceive time, we experience it. If we were able to “see” the 4th dimension (time), you be able to see matter in all forms it has been and ever will be. Hard to comprehend, but we only perceive the present, and are fully controlled by time otherwise. Imagine if the dimension of time was spatial and you could see it: You could look both forward and backward in time, able to perceive all prior, current, and future states of matter and energy simply by "looking in a different direction". Hell, if you did it with your eyes, you would have temporal depth perception, able to see not only a single instant but a little before and after it as well. We, unfortunately, are not really 4-dimensional beings. Our perceptions are of the "present" (which is, in fact, the very recent past as our nerve impulses and cog
Reddit - Please wait for verification
saved by
related reading
- A Mathematician's Guided Tour Through Higher Dimensions | WIREDwired.com
- How to think about timepsyche.co
- Putting Time In Perspective – UPDATEDwaitbutwhy.com
- The Depth Dimension - by Patrick Doerksen - Re-Enchantmentpatrickdoerksen.substack.com
- Why Time Slows Down When We’re Afraid, Speeds Up as We Age, and Gets Warped on Vacation – The Marginalianthemarginalian.org
- How many dimensions are there, and what do they do to reality?aeon.co
- Cartoon Epistemology by Steven Lehar (2003) | Qualia Computingqualiacomputing.com
- the past lies aheadsophielwang.com
- ‘Story Of Your Life’ Is Not A Time-Travel Story · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Exotic spheres, or why 4-dimensional space is a crazy place | plus.maths.orgplus.maths.org
- We’re not as 3-Dimensional as We Think — LessWronglesswrong.com
- people are portalsvelvetnoise.substack.com