Applying IQ to IQ - Razib Khan's Unsupervised Learning
razib.substack.com · 3,684 words · saved by 1 readers
Selecting for smarts is important
Give a gift subscription The holidays are upon us. By way of thanking all of you for being so willing to support my fledgling substack project, this week I'm releasing a little set of year-end mini-posts. These are five quick daily reads about the state as I see it of five sectors I follow. Might have been perfect for raising the level of chitchat at a normal year's run of December parties. In 2020, I hope they'll edify if it's not your field and that you'll let me know what I'm missing if it's your bailiwick I'm reflecting on. Thank you for reading, for subscribing, and for forwarding to…
related reading
- Attention is all we havedavidbessis.substack.com
- The Algernon Argument · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Why Are Individual IQ Differences OK? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why aren't smart people happier? - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- Hotel Concierge — The Stanford Marshmallow Prison Experimenthotelconcierge.tumblr.com
- Encephalization quotient - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Is It Worth Being Wise?paulgraham.com
- Fertility in an IQ Currency Civilizationeurydicelives.substack.com
- The Parable Of The Talents | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- Beyond Smartpaulgraham.com
- The implausibility of intelligence explosion | by François Chollet | Mediummedium.com