The "Design Conductor" paper is bunk | ~/mlyoung
A paper about an 'agent' 'autonomously' building a 1.5 GHz 'Linux-capable' CPU turns out to be full of misinformation and unfair comparisons. I.e., it's bunk. I break down why.
The "Design Conductor" paper is bunk | ~/mlyoung The "Design Conductor" paper is bunk 02 Apr, 2026 • 3169 words Table of Contents Introduction Recently, a paper (PDF) was published on arXiv entitled "Design Conductor: An agent autonomously builds a 1.5 GHz Linux-capable RISC-V CPU" . This paper describes the authors, from a startup called "Verkor", using an AI "agent" they call "Design Conductor" to design a RISC-V chip called VerCore . This has been breathlessly covered in the media, most notably by Adafruit ; but by others (1) , (2) as well. This paper, however, has an enormous number o
saved by
related reading
- [2603.08716] Design Conductor: An agent autonomously builds a 1.5 GHz Linux-capable RISC-V CPUarxiv.org
- Meta harness makes 10 times better Kimi K3 chipluoluo.ai
- PiTorch: ML on Baremetal Raspberry Pis | projectsmasonjwang.com
- RL isn’t the silver bullet for AI-powered chip designzach.be
- Current AIs seem pretty misaligned to me — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Chip Architecturesjacobpeake.com
- A basic systems architecture for AI agents that do autonomous research — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Chip design from the bottom up – Reiner Popeyoutube.com
- architect-labs-redwood.pdfarchitectlabs.com
- Architect Labsarchitectlabs.com
- AI EDAs: Is It Real?youtube.com
- KernelBench: Can LLMs Write GPU Kernels?scalingintelligence.stanford.edu