quantum mechanics - Binomial expansion of non-commutative operators - Physics Stack Exchange
Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams. Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams. Explore Teams Teams Q&A for work Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I would like to determine the general expansion of ( 𝐴 ̂ + 𝐵 ̂ ) 𝑛 , ( 𝐴 ^ + 𝐵 ^ ) 𝑛 , where [ 𝐴 ̂ , 𝐵 ̂ ]≠0 [ 𝐴 ^ , 𝐵 ^ ] ≠ 0 , i.e. 𝐴 ̂ 𝐴 ^ and 𝐵 ̂ 𝐵 ^ are two generally non-commutative operators. How could I express this in terms of summations of the products of 𝐴 ̂ 𝐴 ^ and 𝐵 ̂ 𝐵 ^ operators? I would like to determine the general expansion of (𝐴+𝐵 ) 𝑛 ( 𝐴 + 𝐵 ) 𝑛 , where [A,B]≠0 The expansion of (𝐴+𝐵 ) 𝑛 ( 𝐴 + 𝐵 ) 𝑛 for non-commuti
quantum mechanics - Binomial expansion of non-commutative operators - Physics Stack Exchange Stack Internal Knowledge at work Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work. Explore Stack Internal Binomial expansion of non-commutative operators Ask Question Asked 11 years, 2 months ago Modified 4 years, 3 months ago Viewed 13k times 16 $\begingroup$ I would like to determine the general expansion of $$(\hat{A}+\hat{B})^n,$$ where $[\hat{A},\hat{B}]\neq 0$ , i.e. $\hat{A}$ and $\hat{B}$ are two generally non-commutative operators. How could I express this in terms of su
saved by
related reading
- quantum mechanics - Basis functions in group theory and wave functions - Physics Stack Exchangephysics.stackexchange.com
- quantum mechanics - Does the Heisenberg uncertainty principle only allow location OR momentum to exist? - Physics Stack Exchangephysics.stackexchange.com
- Quantum computing for the very curiousquantum.country
- Physics of Quantum Mechanicswww-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk
- quantum mechanics - Why not use the Lagrangian, instead of the Hamiltonian, in nonrelativistic QM? - Physics Stack Exchangephysics.stackexchange.com
- Second Quantizationnucleartalent.github.io
- quantum mechanics - Why do bosons tend to occupy the same state? - Physics Stack Exchangephysics.stackexchange.com
- quantum mechanics - Up and down spin are orthogonal, not antiparallel - Physics Stack Exchangephysics.stackexchange.com
- GitHub - BoltzmannEntropy/polarization: A group for computer scientists and physicists with aspirations of becoming quantum scientists. Quantum computing, jobs, books and graduate school are amongst the topics covered.github.com
- Interpretations of quantum mechanics - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Complete set of commuting observables - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagreenature.com