Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree | Nature Communications
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Nature Communications volume 12, Article number: 7021 (2021) Cite this article 10k Accesses 7 Citations 65 Altmetric Metrics details Is the world quantum? An active research line in quantum foundations is devoted to exploring what constraints can rule out the postquantum theories that are consistent with experimentally observed results. We explore this question in the context of epistemics, and ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. Aumann’s seminal Agreement Theorem states that two observers (of classical systems) cannot agree t
Classical agreement theorem We start with an intuition about the setup behind the classical agreement theorem. Suppose that Alice and Bob share a classical system, which can, thus, be described by a local hidden-variable model (in Aumann’s language, each value of the variable represents a state of the world). But the observers do not know which value of the hidden variable is the one that holds (i.e., which is the true state of the world). Instead, each observer can perform only one local measurement on the system. Each measurement corresponds to a partition over the values of the variable,…
saved by
related reading
- Common Knowledge and Aumann’s Agreement Theoremscottaaronson.blog
- The Universe Is Not Locally Real, and the Physics Nobel Prize Winners Proved It | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
- Bohr–Einstein debates - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- No-communication theoremen.wikipedia.org
- Why the world needs quantum mechanics – Michael Nielsenmichaelnielsen.org
- Interpretations of Probability (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- [2604.14234] Consciousness, Quantum Mechanics, and the Limits of Scientific Objectivismarxiv.org
- Shtetl-Optimized >> Blog Archive >> 50 Years of Aumann’s Agreement Theoremscottaaronson.blog
- Interpretations of quantum mechanics - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Towards a scale-free theory of intelligent agency — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- How quantum teleportation worksquantum.country
- wentaculus.pdfeddykemingchen.net