Three learnings about Focused Research Organizations
substack.com · 1,082 words · saved by 1 readers
A retrospective on four years of an experiment in a new way of organizing science.
It has been roughly 4 years now since Adam Marblestone and I originally conceived of Focused Research Organizations (FROs), building on years of discussions and collaborations with a variety of colleagues at MIT and elsewhere as we struggled to create more scalable science projects. In the time since then, Adam and I worked to flesh out the idea in a series of white papers, and Adam then founded Convergent Research with Anastasia Gamick to spin out FROs with the initial support of Schmidt Futures, a philanthropic initiative of Eric and Wendy Schmidt. Due primarily to the exceptional efforts…
related reading
- Convergent Research | About FROsconvergentresearch.org
- Convergent Researchen.wikipedia.org
- Adam Marblestone | Focused Research Organizations — science betterscibetter.com
- Unblock research bottlenecks with non-profit start-upsnature.com
- A Taxonomy of R&D Orgsanalogue.press
- What I did wrong with Artemisalexaraki.substack.com
- We Need a New Science of Progress - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- OpenAI’s big lesson for science policysecondbest.ca
- Things I learned talking to the new breed of scientific institutionowlposting.com
- Guest Post: Things I learned talking to the new breed of scientific institutiongoodscience.substack.com
- Companies that should exist - Anastasia Gamickanastasiagamick.substack.com
- How to think about the differences between FROs and private ARPA programsparpa.substack.com