What I did wrong with Artemis - by Alex Shintaro Araki
alexaraki.substack.com · 1,080 words · saved by 1 readers
Part 2/2 on what didn’t work.
In 2024 I started a project that became Artemis, a $35M Focused Research Organization focused on developing better non-mouse animal models for biomedical research. In December 2025, I shut it down to make room for new adventures. Along the way, I learned a few things that may be helpful if you’re considering a similar journey. So here they are… FROs are often created on a set of pre-set milestones attached to lots of pre-committed funding. It’s hard to be “stubborn on vision but flexible on the details” when you search for funding in this pre-commitment and technical-first approach. Though…
saved by
related reading
- Three learnings about Focused Research Organizationssubstack.com
- Convergent Research | About FROsconvergentresearch.org
- Convergent Researchen.wikipedia.org
- Manifesto · Moth Fundmothfund.com
- Thesis-Driven Philanthropic Funds - Renaissance Philanthropy – A brighter future for all through science, technology, and innovationrenaissancephilanthropy.org
- How to think about the differences between FROs and private ARPA programsspec.tech
- Zvi’s Thoughts on the Survival and Flourishing Fund (SFF) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Adam Marblestone | Focused Research Organizations — science betterscibetter.com
- Working on vs. Solvinganastasiagamick.substack.com
- Unblock research bottlenecks with non-profit start-upsnature.com
- What We Learned Doing Fast Grants | Futurefuture.a16z.com
- Companies that should exist - Anastasia Gamickanastasiagamick.substack.com