Effective Altruism's Implicit Epistemology — EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 8,454 words · saved by 1 readers
Note: This post primarily examines the informal epistemic norms which govern EA. Consequently, it's mostly a work of sociology rather than philosoph…
Cross-posted from The Violet Hour. Note: This post primarily examines the informal epistemic norms which govern EA. Consequently, it's mostly a work of sociology rather than philosophy. These informal norms are fleshed out in Section 4, and I’ll briefly state them here.[1] If it’s worth doing, it’s worth doing with made up numbers. Speculative reasoning is worth doing. Our explicit, subjective credences are approximately accurate enough, most of the time, even in crazy domains, for it to be worth treating those credences as a salient input into action. When arguments lead us to…
related reading
- Notes on Effective Altruismmichaelnotebook.com
- Effective Altruism's Implicit Epistemologytheviolethour.substack.com
- Probabilities, Prioritization, and Bayesian Mindsettheviolethour.substack.com
- Doing EA Better — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Probabilities Without Measurements | Vaden Masranivmasrani.github.io
- The Deaths of Effective Altruism | WIREDwired.com
- Why We Can't Take Expected Value Estimates Literally (Even When They're Unbiased) — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Priors and Prejudice — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Effective altruism in the garden of ends — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Richard Pettigrew | Philosophyrichardpettigrew.com
- Bayesian Mindsetcold-takes.com
- Deference Culture in EA — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org