Effective Altruism's Implicit Epistemology — EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 8,454 words · saved by 1 readers
Note: This post primarily examines the informal epistemic norms which govern EA. Consequently, it's mostly a work of sociology rather than philosoph…
Cross-posted from The Violet Hour. Note: This post primarily examines the informal epistemic norms which govern EA. Consequently, it's mostly a work of sociology rather than philosophy. These informal norms are fleshed out in Section 4, and I’ll briefly state them here.[1] If it’s worth doing, it’s worth doing with made up numbers. Speculative reasoning is worth doing. Our explicit, subjective credences are approximately accurate enough, most of the time, even in crazy domains, for it to be worth treating those credences as a salient input into action. When arguments lead us to…
related reading
- Effective Altruism's Implicit Epistemologytheviolethour.substack.com
- Notes on Effective Altruismmichaelnotebook.com
- Doing EA Better — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Probabilities, Prioritization, and Bayesian Mindsettheviolethour.substack.com
- ⚡️ Towards Ineffective Altruismreboothq.substack.com
- In defence of epistemic modesty — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- We should be more uncertain about cause prioritization based on philosophical arguments — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- EA Safetycontraptions.venkateshrao.com
- Nintil - On Reboot's Ineffective Altruismnintil.com
- The motivated reasoning critique of effective altruism — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Post 45: Simplify EA Pitches to “Holy Shit, X-Risk” - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- The Soul of EA is in Troublefrommatter.substack.com