AI safety PACs should be more transparent about who’s funding them
transformernews.ai · 1,223 words · saved by 1 readers
While advocating for accountability and transparency, the Public First Action network of super PACs is obscuring where its money comes from
AI safety PACs should be more transparent about who’s funding them While advocating for accountability and transparency, the Public First Action network of super PACs is obscuring where its money comes from Veronica Irwin Apr 23, 2026 10 1 1 Share Credit: Public First Action One of the central purposes of campaign finance law is to provide voters with transparency over who is trying to sway their votes. One of the central policy priorities of AI safety group Public First Action is to make AI companies more transparent. It is ironic, then, that Public First Action is operating as a “dark money”
saved by
related reading
- Meet the super PAC trying to kill AI regulationtransformernews.ai
- How to buy an AI ‘grassroots’ movement - by Veronica Irwintransformernews.ai
- OpenAI isn’t being consistently candid about Leading the Futuretransformernews.ai
- Is this OpenAI’s anonymous Twitter sockpuppet account? - Model Republicmodelrepublic.org
- The reporters at this news site are AI bots. OpenAI’s super PAC appears to be funding it. - Model Republicmodelrepublic.org
- AI’s next big blue battleground - by Veronica Irwintransformernews.ai
- Is OpenAI changing its tune on AI laws?transformernews.ai
- An Oregon congresswoman distanced herself from Leading the Future — then backtrackedtransformernews.ai
- The best AI bill yet may not get fartransformernews.ai
- Open-source Kimi K3 model is no reason for China panicsubstack.com
- AI populism's safety problemtransformernews.ai
- Leading the Future - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org