The truth of the matter | Meta-rationality
metarationality.com · 2,050 words · saved by 1 readers
Formal rationality requires absolute truths, but those are rare in the eggplant-sized world. How do we do rationality without them?
Ostrich courtesy Krzysztof Niewolny Most true statements are not absolutely true. They may be true enough for all practical purposes; true in some sense; officially true, but effectively meaningless; true, other things being equal; true, as far as it goes; or true in theory, but not in practice. Generically, we can call these sort-of truths . 1 Sort-of truth causes trouble for most brands of rationalism . In particular, the formal methods underlying logicism and probabilism both depend on absolute truth. The fundamental principle of logical deduction is that it is absolute-truth-preserving . I
related reading
- Rationality and refrigerators | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Probability theory, understood meta-rationallymeaningness.substack.com
- Definability of Truth in Probabilistic Logic - Christiano 2013intelligence.org
- Why I'm not a Bayesianmindthefuture.info
- In the Cells of the Eggplant | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- Dark Side Epistemology — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Dark Arts of Rationality — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Probabilities are not the right concept — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The collapse of rational certainty | Meaningnessmeaningness.com
- Rationalization — LessWronglesswrong.com