Human Bottlenecks
borretti.me · 1,596 words · saved by 3 readers
Why AI won't augment human capabilities much.
AI models are very capable and get more capable each year. So naturally people feel they’re underusing them. There’s a tweet that goes like: your laptop has a 100M USD startup in it, you just have to figure the right sequence of words to get it out. And beyond money, people imagine AI could boost them in every area of life. Thus all these perennial ideas: of an AI executive assistant, an AI tutor, an AI that curates your “digital garden”, an AI that (sigh) writes flashcards for you. The general template is: if only I could wire up the right prompts and the right tools in the right harness, I c
saved by
related reading
- Infinite midwit - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework - 1962 (AUGMENT,3906,) - Doug Engelbart Institutedougengelbart.org
- AI as Normal Technology | Knight First Amendment Instituteknightcolumbia.org
- Economics and Transformative AI | Tom Cunningham – Tom Cunninghamtecunningham.github.io
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- Why transformative artificial intelligence is really, really hard to achievethegradient.pub
- A Workaphile’s Apologymoalquraishi.wordpress.com
- The People Who Will Thrive in the AI Age - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- After Automation | Everyevery.to
- Intelligence is not the main bottleneck - by Ruxandra Teslowritingruxandrabio.com
- What will be left for us to work on?normaltech.ai
- Sporadicamichaelnotebook.com