Caught in the web · Gabe Stein
gabestein.com · 1,470 words · saved by 1 readers
Will replacing the attention economy with a speculation economy really more fairly distribute power?
So, here’s my basic problem with web3: I find that many of its critiques of web 2.0’s distribution of power are valid, but I’m pretty sure the way web3 tries to solve them are incoherent, at best, and self-defeating, at worst. A case in point this week is a piece , sent to me by a close friend, in which crypto investor Li Jin and writer Katie Parrot make their best case for web3 as a revolutionary new economic model for creators. Essentially, they argue that by monetizing attention, rather than content itself, web 2.0 gave too much money and power to platforms who could aggregate attention, an
related reading
- Paid in Full — Real Lifereallifemag.com
- Moxie Marlinspike >> Blog >> My first impressions of web3moxie.org
- The Web3 Renaissance: A Golden Age for Contentli.substack.com
- Chris Dixon thinks web3 is the future of the internet — is it? | The Vergetheverge.com
- The Ownership Economy 2022 – Variantvariant.fund
- From Winner Take All to Win and Help Win: the Original Vision of… — Sari Azoutsariazout.mirror.xyz
- The Ownership Economy 2022li.substack.com
- The Ownership Economy – Variantvariant.fund
- The Web3 Movement’s Quest to Build a ‘Can’t Be Evil’ Internet | WIREDwired.com
- Why Build in Web3hbr.org
- The Internet of NFTscypheronin.substack.com
- Three quarks | David Phelps | Substackdavidphelps.substack.com