The nature of LLM algorithmic progress (v2) — LessWrong
There’s a lot of talk about “algorithmic progress” in LLMs, especially in the context of exponentially-improving algorithmic efficiency. For example: …
x The nature of LLM algorithmic progress (v2) — LessWrong AI Frontpage 2026 Top Fifty: 36 % 123 The nature of LLM algorithmic progress (v2) by Steven Byrnes 5th Feb 2026 15 min read 28 123 (Heavily revised on Feb. 9, 2026—see changelog at the bottom.) There’s a lot of talk about “algorithmic progress” in LLMs, especially in the context of exponentially-improving algorithmic efficiency. For example: Epoch AI : “[training] compute required to reach a set performance threshold has halved approximately every 8 months”. Dario Amodei 2025 : “I'd guess the number today is maybe ~4x/year”. Gundlach et
saved by
related reading
- You can’t imitation-learn how to continual-learn — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Pretraining progress is mostly coming from datadwarkesh.com
- RL Scaling Laws for LLMs - by Cameron R. Wolfe, Ph.D.cameronrwolfe.substack.com
- My picture of the present in AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- [2510.13786] The Art of Scaling Reinforcement Learning Compute for LLMsarxiv.org
- The least understood driver of AI progress | Epoch AIepoch.ai
- Most Algorithmic Progress is Data Progressberen.io
- There Are No New Ideas in AI… Only New Datasetsblog.jxmo.io
- Lil'Loglilianweng.github.io
- AI in 2025: gestalt — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Algorithmic Improvement Is Probably Faster Than Scaling Now — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Will scaling work?dwarkeshpatel.com