Is Scientific Genius a Thing of the Past? - Joscha Bach
bach.ai · 1,019 words · saved by 2 readers
Where have all the geniuses gone? Is the time of big scientific discoveries over? Or did the way science works fundamentally change?
“Is scientific genius a thing of the past?” asks Kate Shaw in Ars Technica, and points our attention to a nature paper by psychologist Dean Keith Simonton: Today, according to Simonton, there just isn’t room to create new disciplines or overthrow the old ones. “It is difficult to imagine that scientists have overlooked some phenomenon worthy of its own discipline,” he writes. Furthermore, most scientific fields aren’t in the type of crisis that would enable paradigm shifts, according to Thomas Kuhn’s classic view of scientific revolutions. Simonton argues that instead of finding big new ideas,
saved by
related reading
- How awe drives scientists to make a leap into the unknownaeon.co
- Designing AI for Disruptive Scienceasimov.press
- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Is Science Stagnant? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Neuroscience is pre-paradigmatic. Consciousness is whytheintrinsicperspective.com
- When do ideas get easier to find?freaktakes.substack.com
- Interview: Peter Thiel on Scientific Stagnationharvardsalient.com
- Disruptive scientific research is slowing — and threatening progress | Voxvox.com
- Why science needs outsiders - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co