Verso
In General Intellects there was only space to cover twenty-one influential theorists. I'm often asked why this or that figure is not in it. Here's an attempt to compress the work of Nick Land — one I'm most often asked about. And certainly one of the most controversial.
Blog post In General Intellects there was only space to cover twenty-one influential theorists. I'm often asked why this or that figure is not in it. Here's an attempt to compress the work of Nick Land — one I'm most often asked about. And certainly one of the most controversial. McKenzie Wark19 June 2017 In General Intellects there was only space to cover twenty-one influential theorists. I'm often asked why this or that figure is not in it. My answer is usually that I think people could make their own lists and do their own attempts at compression to create brief, functional accounts…
related reading
- Nick Land - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- What is Nick Land’s philosophy of accelerationism really?aeon.co
- Coldness Be My Geist: Nick Land, Ludwig Klages, and the War for the Soul of the Earth – metanomadmetanomad.blog
- How Philosophers Think - David Perellperell.com
- Means and Meaning - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- What It Means To Be An Intellectual (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)aaronsw.com
- On Neoreaction – Undisciplining 2018thesociologicalreview.org
- Matt Yglesias Considered As The Nietzschean Supermanastralcodexten.com
- Rule Thinkers In, Not Out — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Stove, What Is Wrong With Our Thoughtsweb.maths.unsw.edu.au
- On the Utility of Philosophylogangraves.com