flâneur

On Neoreaction

thesociologicalreview.org · 1,659 words · saved by 1 readers

On the final day of the Undisciplining conference in June 2018 I was asked, at short notice, to participate in a ‘fireside chat’ session concerned with ‘defending the social.’ My contribution made mention of a philosophical position, which I characterized as a form of Deleuzian Fascism. Not surprisingly, a number of people approached me afterwards to seek clarification. I hope this brief article provides some useful - albeit deeply troubling - pointers. Those requiring a bit more detail can find it in a forthcoming book chapter, whilst those requiring a book-length critical treatment might read Sandifer’s recent Neoreaction: A Basilisk.

On Neoreaction – Undisciplining 2018 Undisciplining Talks, discussions and debates Roger Burrows 29 September 2018 On the final day of the Undisciplining conference in June 2018 I was asked, at short notice, to participate in a ‘fireside chat’ session concerned with ‘defending the social.’ My contribution made mention of a philosophical position, which I characterized as a form of Deleuzian Fascism . Not surprisingly, a number of people approached me afterwards to seek clarification. I hope this brief article provides some useful - albeit deeply troubling - pointers. Those requiring a bit more

saved by

related reading