[2601.19062] Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage

Abstract:Although AI assistants are now deeply embedded in society, there has been limited empirical study of how their usage affects human empowerment. We present the first large-scale empirical analysis of disempowerment patterns in real-world AI assistant interactions, analyzing 1.5 million consumer Claude$.$ai conversations using a privacy-preserving approach. We focus on situational disempowerment potential, which occurs when AI assistant interactions risk leading users to form distorted perceptions of reality, make inauthentic value judgments, or act in ways misaligned with their values. Quantitatively, we find that severe forms of disempowerment potential occur in fewer than one in a thousand conversations, though rates are substantially higher in personal domains like relationships and lifestyle. Qualitatively, we uncover several concerning patterns, such as validation of persecution narratives and grandiose identities with emphatic sycophantic language, definitive moral judgments about third parties, and complete scripting of value-laden personal communications that users appear to implement verbatim. Analysis of historical trends reveals an increase in the prevalence of disempowerment potential over time. We also find that interactions with greater disempowerment potential receive higher user approval ratings, possibly suggesting a tension between short-term user preferences and long-term human empowerment. Our findings highlight the need for AI systems designed to robustly support human autonomy and flourishing.

Who’s in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usage Mrinank Sharma 1 Miles McCain 1 Raymond Douglas 2 3 David Duvenaud 3 Abstract 1. Introduction Although AI assistants are now deeply embedded The greatest hazard of all, losing one’s self, can occur in society, there has been limited empirical…

related reading

• [2601.19062] Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usagearxiv.org
• [Literature Review] Who's in Charge? Disempowerment Patterns in Real-World LLM Usagethemoonlight.io
• Gradual Disempowermentgradual-disempowerment.ai
• [2605.07912] Sycophantic AI makes human interaction feel more effortful and less satisfying over timearxiv.org
• Oversight Assistants: Turning Compute into Understandingbounded-regret.ghost.io
• Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Developmentarxiv.org
• [2604.22082] Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervisionarxiv.org
• Quantifying the Utility of User Simulators for Building Collaborative LLM Assistantsarxiv.org
• [2606.06614] Re-Centering Humans in LLM Personalizationarxiv.org
• User awareness in frontier modelstransluce.org
• Cognitive Security as an AI Safety Cause Area — LessWronglesswrong.com
• 2308.03958arxiv.org