[2604.22082] Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervision
Abstract:As AI systems begin to automate complex tasks, supervision increasingly relies on weaker models or limited human oversight that cannot fully verify output quality. A model more capable than its supervisors could exploit this gap through sandbagging, producing work that appears acceptable but falls short of its true abilities. Can training elicit a model's best work even without reliable verification? We study this using model organisms trained to sandbag, testing elicitation techniques on problem-solving math, graduate-level science, and competitive coding tasks. We find that training with weak supervision can reliably elicit sandbagging models when supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) are combined: SFT on weak demonstrations breaks the sandbagging behavior, enabling RL to then fully elicit performance. Neither method succeeds reliably alone-RL without SFT almost always leads to reward hacking rather than genuine improvement, and SFT without RL fails to elicit full performance when the supervisor is much weaker than the untrusted model. Critically, this relies on training being indistinguishable from deployment; when models can distinguish between training and deployment, they can perform well during training while continuing to sandbag afterward. Our results provide initial evidence that training is a viable mitigation against sandbagging, while highlighting the importance of making training indistinguishable from deployment.
# link_25wb0f7mkq2.pdf ## Metadata - PDFFormatVersion=1.7 - IsLinearized=false - IsAcroFormPresent=false - IsXFAPresent=false - IsCollectionPresent=false - IsSignaturesPresent=false - Author=Emil Ryd; Henning Bartsch; Julian Stastny; Joe Benton; Vivek Hebbar - Creator=arXiv GenPDF (tex2pdf:a6404ea) - Custom.DOI=https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.22082 - Custom.License=http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ - Custom.PTEX.Fullbanner=This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.28 (TeX Live 2025) kpathsea version 6.4.1 - Custom.arXivID=https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.22082v2 - Producer=pikepdf 8
saved by
related reading
- [2604.22082] Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak Supervisionarxiv.org
- Should We Train Against (CoT) Monitors? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Automated Weak-to-Strong Researcheralignment.anthropic.com
- Evaluation-Conditioned Training: Teaching Models to Generalize to Stronger Oversight Regimesarxiv.org
- [2312.06942] AI Control: Improving Safety Despite Intentional Subversionarxiv.org
- Automated Researchers Can Subtly Sandbagalignment.anthropic.com
- [2510.27062] Consistency Training Helps Stop Sycophancy and Jailbreaksarxiv.org
- Misalignment and Strategic Underperformance: An Analysis of Sandbagging and Exploration Hackingblog.redwoodresearch.org
- Unsupervised Elicitationalignment.anthropic.com
- [2312.09390] Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervisionar5iv.labs.arxiv.org
- Research Areas in Methods for Post-training and Elicitation (The Alignment Project by UK AISI) — AI Alignment Forumalignmentforum.org
- [2401.05566] Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingarxiv.org