From Philosophy to Math to Engineering - Machine Intelligence Research Institute
For centuries, philosophers wondered how we could learn what causes what. Some argued it was impossible, or possible only via experiment. Others kept hacking
For centuries, philosophers wondered how we could learn what causes what. Some argued it was impossible, or possible only via experiment. Others kept hacking away at the problem, clarifying ideas like counterfactual and probability and correlation by making them more precise and coherent. Then, in the 1990s, a breakthrough: Judea Pearl and others showed that, in principle, we can sometimes infer causal relations from data even without experiment, via the mathematical machinery of probabilistic graphical models. Next, engineers used this mathematical insight to write software that can, in…
saved by
related reading
- theory uplift differentially benefits safety & is underleveraged — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Existential Risk from AI: An Exposition for Mathematiciansalkjash.github.io
- More Is Different for AIbounded-regret.ghost.io
- As Rocks May Think | Eric Jangevjang.com
- Is causality the missing piece of the AI puzzle?qualcomm.com
- To Build Truly Intelligent Machines, Teach Them Cause and Effect | Quanta Magazinequantamagazine.org
- Unfalsifiable stories of doom | Mechanize, Inc.mechanize.work
- Dreams of Friendliness — LessWronglesswrong.com
- 2023 letter | Zhengdongzhengdongwang.com
- LYDIAlydia.ml
- Getting Eulered | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- The Universe from an Intentional Stancecasparoesterheld.com