They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie? | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 11,526 words · saved by 1 readers
Dan Ariely and Francesca Gino became famous for their research into why we bend the truth. Now they’ve both been accused of fabricating data.
Save this story Save this story The half-bearded behavioral economist Dan Ariely tends to preface discussions of his work—which has inquired into the mechanisms of pain, manipulation, and lies—with a reminder that he comes by both his eccentric facial hair and his academic interests honestly. He tells a version of the story in the introduction to his breezy first book, “Predictably Irrational,” a patchwork of marketing advice and cerebral self-help. One afternoon in Israel, Ariely—an “18-year-old military trainee,” according to the Times —was nearly incinerated. “An explosion of a large magnes
related reading
- Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The Darker Side of Aaron Swartz | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The Science & Psychology of Lyingtownandcountrymag.com
- The Inside Story Of Leverage Research 1.0lydialaurenson.substack.com
- Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions by Dan Ariely - Audiobooks on Google Playplay.google.com
- The Lies and Falsifications of Oliver Sackskottke.org
- The Dangerous Populist Science of Yuval Noah Hararicurrentaffairs.org
- No, it’s not The Incentives—it’s you – [citation needed]talyarkoni.org
- Confront reality (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)aaronsw.com
- Dark Side Epistemology — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Everyone Feels Like They’re Faking It | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Column: Why Businesses Don’t Experimenthbr.org