"Moral progress" vs. the simple passage of time
In Future-Proof Ethics, I talked about trying to "consistently [make] ethical decisions that look better, with hindsight after a great deal of moral progress, than what our peer-trained intuitions tell us to do." I cited Kwame Anthony Appiah's comment that "common-sense" ethics has endorsed horrible things in the past (such
In Future-Proof Ethics , I talked about trying to "consistently [make] ethical decisions that look better, with hindsight after a great deal of moral progress, than what our peer-trained intuitions tell us to do." I cited Kwame Anthony Appiah's comment that "common-sense" ethics has endorsed horrible things in the past (such as slavery and banning homosexuality), and his question of whether we, today, can do better by the standards of the future. A common objection to this piece was along the lines of: Who cares how future generations look back on me? They'll have lots of views that are differ
saved by
related reading
- On the Value of Advancing Progress - Toby Ordtobyord.com
- Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Future-proof ethicscold-takes.com
- Progress (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Convergence and Compromise: Will Society Aim for Good Futures?forethought.org
- How Can Society Prepare for the Moral Norms of Tomorrow? | WIREDwired.com
- No Easy Eutopia: Why Great Futures Are Hard to Achieveforethought.org
- Alignment & Succession: Morality Lives in the Human Individualnosetgauge.com
- Prolegomena to a Theory of Fun — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Matt Yglesias Considered As The Nietzschean Supermanastralcodexten.com
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Base Camp for Mt. Ethicsnickbostrom.com