In Defense of a Dogma
sites.ualberta.ca · 7,459 words · saved by 1 readers
N/A
Philosophical Review In Defense of a Dogma Author(s): H. P. Grice and P. F. Strawson Source: The Philosophical Review, Vol. 65, No. 2 (Apr., 1956), pp. 141-158 Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical Review Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2182828 Accessed: 22/02/2010 22:41 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download…
related reading
- Two Dogmas of Empiricism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Ludwig.Wittgenstein.-.Philosophical.Investigations.pdfstatic1.squarespace.com
- The Problems of Philosophy | Project Gutenberggutenberg.org
- ‘Two dogmas’ revisited (Chapter 5) - Philosophical Paperscambridge.org
- I think Quine's "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" is very convincing. But I haven't read any serious papers that oppose him. Who are Quine's best critics? : r/askphilosophyreddit.com
- Beware Isolated Demands For Rigorslatestarcodex.com
- DCDRealPatterns1991.pdfweb.ics.purdue.edu
- Guidelines on Writing a Philosophy Paperjimpryor.net
- Quine, Willard Van Orman: Analytic/Synthetic Distinction | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyiep.utm.edu
- Stove, What Is Wrong With Our Thoughtsweb.maths.unsw.edu.au
- HUME’S PRINCIPLE, BAD COMPANY, AND THE AXIOM OF CHOICE | The Review of Symbolic Logic | Cambridge Corecambridge.org
- Why I'm not a Bayesianmindthefuture.info